This post is also available in:
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
The COVID-19 pandemic has created an unprecedented disruption for the global tourism industry, posing severe challenges to international travel and traditional mass gatherings. Within this context, rural tourism has emerged as a viable alternative, offering opportunities for economic development, community revitalization, and fulfilling the evolving demands of tourists seeking safety, outdoor experiences, and connection with nature.
This paper explores the role of rural tourism in the “new normal,” emphasizing opportunities, principles of responsible development, and the necessary strategies to foster a resilient and sustainable rural tourism sector.
The Tourism Context Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic
The pandemic has profoundly affected the tourism industry, thrusting it into a period of unparalleled uncertainty. Air transport came to a standstill, with planes grounded at airports, while cruise ships suspended operations—many postponing voyages until the following year. As a result, countless individuals were unable to realize their travel aspirations.
Travel restrictions left people feeling “trapped at home” and increasingly disheartened. Traditional recreational activities such as concerts, sporting events, and large festivals were canceled or shifted to online formats. This shift accelerated the emergence of a “new normal,” in which digital interactions became commonplace. In order to break free from monotony and maintain quality of life, people sought new, safe, and socially responsible forms of leisure that complied with health measures such as mask-wearing and social distancing.
Rural Tourism: A Solution in the “New Normal”
Rural tourism has been recognized as an optimal choice for individuals seeking to restore livelihoods and generate new income streams during the global crisis. It provides an escape from confinement while offering unique and enriching experiences in alignment with safety protocols.
Demand for outdoor experiences: People yearned for activities beyond the constraints of urban life. Rural destinations, with their expansive spaces, limited crowds, scenic landscapes, and authentic encounters, perfectly catered to this demand.
Creative models and examples:
- Adaptive reuse of infrastructure: Ski resorts repurposed into summer cycling trails.
- Outdoor dining: Romantic lakeside dinners or private picnics in the fields.
- Unique accommodations: Converted mobile homes, buses, or shipping containers transformed into boutique lodgings.
- Educational and cultural tours: Visits to community landmarks such as lakes, mountains, forests, or hidden gardens.
- Food tourism: Farm-to-table experiences showcasing local specialties, such as coconut, chocolate, durian, or pomelo production in Davao, Philippines.
- Small-scale accommodation platforms: Airbnb provided safe, clean, and well-connected spaces, often preferred over large hotels during the pandemic.
Economic opportunities: Rural tourism created income-generating prospects for those who lost urban employment.
Profitability: By prioritizing quality experiences for smaller groups rather than mass tourism, rural tourism maximized profitability while minimizing negative impacts on the environment and local culture.
Principles of Responsible Rural Tourism Development
Responsible rural tourism emphasizes sustainably managed activities that continue to generate benefits for local communities.
Destination characteristics: Typically remote, small-scale, nature-oriented, and underdeveloped, offering visitors direct engagement with local economies—primarily agriculture or nature-based activities.
Growth challenges: Uncontrolled development exerts mounting economic, social, and environmental pressures. Rural tourism risks self-destruction if mismanaged.
Asian distinctiveness: Case studies highlight the centrality of culture and natural heritage in shaping rural tourism.
Three pillars of sustainability: People, Planet, and Profit. Achieving balance among economic, environmental, and social priorities is vital, though emphasis may vary by destination (e.g., environmental protection in the Bahamas, cultural preservation in Thailand).
Core dimensions of rurality:
- Location: Escape from urban areas.
- Purpose: Seeking peace, fresh air, and a rural atmosphere.
- Activities and attractions: Unique offerings are essential for appeal.
- Sustainability: Managing economic, environmental, and sociocultural impacts.
- Stakeholders: Local communities, operators, governments, NGOs, and tourists.
Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness (GNH): A guiding philosophy rooted in compassion, empathy, and collaboration, aligned with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Regenerative tourism: Embodied in the principle of “leaving a place better than you found it,” this approach emphasizes enhancement rather than mere preservation, prioritizing high-value over mass tourism.
Comprehensive destination planning: Requires collaboration among government, private sector, and local communities.
Marketing approaches:
- Tourism in the environment: Adventure tourism, diving, mountaineering.
- Tourism about the environment: Emphasizing biodiversity and wildlife.
- Tourism for the environment: Ecotourism, conservation, and learning experiences.
Strategies for Development and Recovery in the New Era
To address current challenges, rural tourism must adopt sustainable and adaptive strategies:
Resilience: The capacity to reassess, rebuild, and recover despite adversity.
Good governance: A cornerstone for policymaking and strengthening economic, environmental, and sociocultural resilience.
Economic diversification: Avoiding overreliance on tourism by integrating with sectors such as agriculture (e.g., agritourism). Destinations dependent solely on tourism faced greater vulnerabilities.
Enhancing local business environments: Supporting enterprises in rural destinations.
Contingency funds: Establishing financial reserves to buffer against shocks such as natural disasters or economic downturns.
Community participation (bottom-up approach): Empowering local residents to lead development processes and ensuring inclusive decision-making. Identifying “champions” within communities is crucial for building widespread support.
Zoning and carrying capacity: Implementing clear regulations to protect natural and cultural assets, with emphasis on the Limit of Acceptable Change (LAC) framework—managing quality and impacts rather than focusing solely on visitor numbers.
Authenticity: Safeguarding cultural norms and heritage to distinguish destinations and attract tourists seeking genuine and distinctive experiences.
Student volunteering: Encouraging students to participate in community or business initiatives, fostering practical skills and competitive advantages post-pandemic.
Diversifying target markets: Beyond ecologically minded travelers, urban tourists increasingly seek safe, outdoor, and wellness-oriented experiences.
Conclusion
Responsible rural tourism has become a critical agenda item for the tourism sector in Asia and the Philippines. Demand for rural tourism products has risen markedly in recent years, particularly in the aftermath of COVID-19, as tourists shifted away from mass tourism toward niche and rural-based experiences.
The tourism industry must adapt rapidly to these shifts. Returning to pre-pandemic practices is no longer viable. Key priorities include resilience, good governance, economic diversification, and strong community engagement. Preserving the spiritual values and rural identities of Asia, while ensuring sustainable and responsible growth, is essential for rural tourism to truly contribute to poverty alleviation and improved quality of life for non-urban communities.
